In a latest development The Indian Supreme Court today has deffered the Ayodhya verdict by at least week.The verdict was to be delivered tomorrow.The matter was heard by a Bench headed by Justice R V Raveendran.The court issued notice the warring parties to the petition filed by a retired bureacrat Ramesh Chand Tripathi challenging the order of Lucknow College Allahabad High Court refused the order to postpone the verdict in the 60-year-old Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute costume title.
He posted a question for further hearing on September 28.
A bench consisting of Judge R. Raveendran and HL Gokhale was sentenced a week after the controversial views on entertainment petition challenging the high court order.
Raveendran Justice opined that the special leave petition filed by Tripathi should be fired while the validity of Gokhale, on the other hand, suggested that the notice must be given to explore options for settlement.
However, Justice Raveendran, who headed the bench, opted to take the opinion of Justice Gokhale.
In the order, Justice Raveendran said: “When one of the judges dissenting views, the tradition is to give notice.”
Notification was sent to the Attorney General of the Supreme Court.
Apex court bench of judges Altmas Kabir and AK Patnaik was yesterday refused to hear an urgent request to postpone the Ayodhya title suit verdict.
By refusing to hear a petition filed by a retired bureaucrat Tripathi, the bench said that he had no “definition” to consider this issue and added that he would be listed before another bench.
Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Counsel appearing on Tripathi, said the Supreme Court may give a healing touch, try a last effort at mediation.
He said that it is possible that in the face of the Supreme Court notified the opposing sides can sit through to find a mutually acceptable solution.
Rohatgi said that next Tuesday by his attempt to tell the court that the issue of the decision should be deferred to religious, political and national leaders can try to work out a solution.
He also said that this is not a matter of just 10 or 20 sides in the case, but connected with hundreds of thousands of rupees and the people and mediation could result in some way.
Tripathi was yesterday moved to court top-five days after the Lucknow bench, the Supreme Court rejected his request for a postponement of sentence and to allow mediation to find solutions to contentious dispute.
Allahabad High Court has also introduced the “exemplary costs” Rs50, 000, calling for efforts Tripathi out-of-court settlement of disputes, as “a mischievous attempt.”
Petition filed by Tripathi seek some time to mediate between parties, as well as contested charges.
Tripathi, in his statement to the top court, said that the sentence may violate the general harmony, and lead to violence in the country.
In a petition filed by a lawyer Sunil Jain, he cited several reasons for postponing the sentence, which he said would be a “public interest” in connection with the apprehension of communal flare up, the upcoming Commonwealth Games, the elections in Bihar and violence in the Kashmir Valley and the Naxal-affected states.
The petition was afraid that would not be sufficient security in Uttar Pradesh to ensure safety.
Tripathi also referred to the earlier order of the court on July 27, finally, that the parties concerned to approach the employee freedom of Special Affairs for the formation of the bench, is it possible to remove the dispute or arrival in the understanding on the basis of consensus.
One of the three-judge bench in Lucknow, however, disagree with the majority of the order dated September 17, rejecting the request for postponement of sentence Ayodhya to house and gave a dissenting opinion that an amicable agreement could be explored in a protracted legal dispute.
Justice Dharam Veer Sharma, while not concurring with the opinion of the other two judges – Justice SU Khan and Justice Sudhir Agarwal – also said in his dissenting decision, that he was not consulted when the three judge bench ordered the dismissal request for mediation.related post about this Ayodhya Verdict
Supreme Court defers Ayodhya verdict .....
-
Apex court defers Ayodhya verdict ....
Ayodhya verdict: Calm after apex court stay....
Allahabad HC refuses to defer Ayodhya verdict..
Ayodhya verdict: The Justices
Mumbai braces for Ayodhya verdict
No comments:
Post a Comment